Native Apps vs Hybrid Apps
  • 27 Sep 2018
  • Admin

Native Apps vs Hybrid Apps

The mobile application that is specifically developed for a selected OS is that the Native app. Like Objective C or Swift for iOS and Java for Android. As the application has been developed among a developed system that has been followed by the technical pointers of the OS and user expertise, this not solely provides the economical however conjointly “feels right”, which implies that the interactions that happen among the app features a look and feel that's in line with several alternative native apps present in the device. For example, address book, camera etc.


Hybrid applications are websites that have been prepackaged into a wrapper. They appear and desire a native app, however, are considerably beyond the essential frame of the app and that they are sponsored by the company’s website. The hybrid app is essentially a web app that has been engineered using JavaScript and HTML5 that has been wrapped up in exceedingly native instrumentation so as to load most of the data on the page because the user navigates through the app. For example, Facebook, Instagram etc.



It takes a couple of minutes to download an application from the market and solely a few seconds to get rid of it if it doesn't match the customer’s experience. User experience is very important in this case. You will never get a second chance to form the first impression.

Appealing UI components, sleek scrolling, platform-specific gesture recognition, advanced animations, and effects, this is often wherever native apps appear like the superior citizens.

In distinction, the hybrid app needs to adapt UI specifications of many platforms at the same time. Even though the cross-platform technologies and frameworks actively excellent themselves. Hybrid apps might look smart and behave like foreigners in your device.


“66% of smartphone and tablet users are annoyed with the page load times.”

Native apps directly communicate with the device hardware, and frequently, all the static content is downloaded once the appliance is installed. So, the user ought not to depend upon the internet speed and may forever have the sleek and reliable work of the app.

In distinction, hybrid apps first have to be compelled to undergo the hybrid platform and execute code, and then address to the device hardware. As per the rule, the content is loaded from the server that fully depends upon the internet speed.

Hybrids got a downfall when Facebook proclaimed that the app has been rapt to native applications and so became additional swish and quicker.

Development Time:

Having one code base, hybrid apps are faster in development. It takes less time to adapt feature from numerous platforms within the hybrid approach than making the planning for all attainable device dimension.


Cost of Development:

Developers unremarkably specialize solely in one platform. So to form the native app for various platforms we tend to need two development groups and which implies two budgets. Any further updates or changes can draw prices increased by the number of platforms.

Hybrid is cheaper as the code is platform independent and can be reused.

From the above all the points it is clear that “It’s Simply an Opinion”. Native and Hybrid apps have their own pros and cons. The decision concerning the selection of apps utterly depends upon the necessity of the organization.